CATEGORIES

Featured (1)

Search

Active Roster

Media

Sponsors

← Back to writing resources
Writing resources

Revision and editing

Diagnose what a draft needs, make the largest decisions first, and then work towards the smaller choices that improve clarity, precision and control.

Articles

Read about revising the work.

Practical approaches to manuscript diagnosis and sentence-level editing.

Article

How to diagnose a manuscript before rewriting it

Find the problems that matter before you start fixing sentences.

From the Writer's Diary 2027
Read article ↓
Article

The sentence that explains the sentence before it

How to spot over-explanation and trust the writing you have already done.

From the Writer's Diary 2027
Read article ↓
Article

How to diagnose a manuscript before rewriting it

Find the problems that matter before you start fixing sentences

From the Writer's Diary 2027

Finishing a draft creates a peculiar temptation. You can finally see the whole manuscript, and almost every page contains something you could improve. A clumsy sentence catches your eye. A scene feels too long. A character disappears for eighty pages. The opening now seems to promise a rather different book from the one you eventually wrote.

If you begin correcting whatever you notice first, revision can become a long series of local repairs. Some will be useful. Others may be wasted when a later structural decision removes the passage altogether.

Before rewriting, find out what the manuscript actually needs.

Read the whole thing first

Give yourself enough distance from the draft to read it with some curiosity. Then read from beginning to end without trying to repair every problem as you encounter it.

Make brief notes. Record where your attention drops, where you become confused, where the pace changes unexpectedly, where a character’s behaviour stops convincing you, and where the manuscript suddenly feels alive. Keep moving.

This first read is about patterns. A weak paragraph is a paragraph. A problem that appears in twelve chapters is part of the manuscript’s structure.

Describe the book you have written

Set the original plan aside for a moment and describe the manuscript that now exists. What happens? Whose story is it? What changes between the beginning and the end? What question or pressure holds the material together?

This can reveal a gap between intention and execution. Perhaps the supposed protagonist has become less important than another character. A memoir planned around one period of life may have developed a second centre. A non-fiction book may contain two strong arguments competing for the same space.

Work with the evidence on the page. Revision becomes much clearer once you know which version of the project you are developing.

Find the problems with the widest reach

Some changes affect a sentence. Others affect fifty pages. Start with the problems that touch the greatest amount of material.

If the protagonist’s central motivation is unclear, dialogue, pacing and individual scenes may all improve once that motivation is repaired. If the chronology is confusing, polishing transitions before you settle the order creates extra work. If two chapters perform the same job, deciding which one belongs may remove pages you would otherwise spend hours editing.

Make a short list of the three problems whose correction would improve the greatest part of the manuscript. These are your first revision priorities.

Follow cause and consequence

In narrative work, look at the chain of events. What causes each significant development? What changes because it happened?

A manuscript can contain plenty of incident while still feeling static if events do not alter later choices. A revelation should affect what someone knows, wants or does. An argument should leave a residue. A decision should narrow or change what becomes possible next.

Where the chain breaks, investigate. You may need a stronger cause, a clearer consequence, or a different event altogether.

Look at character pressure

For each major character, identify what they want during the main movement of the story and what makes that difficult. Then look at how those pressures change.

Characters can appear inconsistent when the manuscript has failed to show the step between one state and another. A reconciliation arrives before enough has happened to make it credible. Fear disappears because the plot needs the character to act. A secondary character creates a problem and then seems to forget it.

Mark those missing steps. They are often more important at this stage than refinements to voice or dialogue.

Check what the reader knows, and when

Information has timing. A fact revealed too early can drain tension from later scenes. The same fact revealed too late may make earlier behaviour incomprehensible.

Track the important pieces of knowledge in the manuscript: secrets, motives, relationships, history, evidence, promises and misunderstandings. Note when the reader learns each one and when the characters learn it.

This is particularly useful when a draft feels confusing in some places and over-explained in others. The underlying problem may be the distribution of information.

Find repetition

First drafts often contain more than one attempt at the same thing. You may explain a relationship in narration and then demonstrate it in the following scene. Two conversations may reach the same conclusion. Three examples may support a point that only needs one.

Look for repeated information, repeated emotional beats and repeated functions. Decide which version carries the most weight, then see what can be cut, combined or reassigned.

Notice where the manuscript is strongest

Diagnosis should include what is working. Mark the scenes, passages or sections where the writing has energy and authority. Ask what they have in common.

Perhaps the viewpoint is closer. Perhaps the characters have something immediate to lose. Perhaps the prose becomes simpler when the subject is emotionally difficult. Perhaps your strongest non-fiction chapters are organised around concrete cases rather than general explanation.

Those successful passages can teach you something about the rest of the manuscript.

Build a revision order

Once you have diagnosed the draft, put the work in an order that prevents you from repeatedly undoing your own edits.

Deal with large structural decisions first: the book’s focus, missing or unnecessary sections, chronology, viewpoint, major character arcs and the order of material. Then move into scene and chapter work. Sentence-level editing and proofreading belong later, when the material itself is reasonably stable.

Your manuscript may need several passes. Give each pass a clear purpose. One might repair structure, another track a character, another tighten explanation, and another concentrate on prose.

Write a short diagnosis before you begin

Summarise the state of the manuscript in a paragraph. Name its strongest feature, the main problem, and the two or three changes that matter most. Then write down the first revision task.

Keep this note nearby. New problems will appear as you work, and some of your original judgements will change. The diagnosis gives you a starting order while leaving room for the manuscript to teach you more during revision.

A complete draft contains far more information than the plan you began with. Read that information carefully before you start rebuilding. The time spent diagnosing the manuscript can save many hours of beautifully editing pages that were never going to survive.

Article

The sentence that explains the sentence before it

How to spot over-explanation and trust the writing you have already done

From the Writer's Diary 2027

A character pushes an untouched plate away. The next sentence tells us that she has lost her appetite.

A man checks the clock for the fourth time in ten minutes. We are then told that he is impatient.

Someone folds a letter carefully, puts it back in its envelope and locks it in a drawer. The narrator explains that the letter matters deeply to her.

In each case, the first sentence has already given the reader something to understand. The explanation that follows repeats the meaning in a more explicit form. This is one of the easiest habits to acquire in a draft because the second sentence often feels clear, sensible and harmless.

Why writers explain twice

Drafting involves discovering what you mean while you are writing it. You put the action on the page, then find the sentence that names its significance. Both remain because each helped you reach the thought.

There is also a natural anxiety about being understood. You know what the gesture means because you know the character, the history and the scene. The reader has only the words you have supplied. Adding an explanation can feel like insurance.

The difficulty is that repeated explanation changes the reader’s experience. Instead of being allowed to notice, infer or feel something, the reader receives the answer immediately afterwards.

Look for action followed by interpretation

The pattern is particularly common in fiction and memoir. A gesture, line of dialogue or physical detail creates an impression; the narration then interprets it.

‘Tom kept his coat on throughout dinner. He wanted to be able to leave quickly.’

The second sentence may contain information the first cannot carry. Perhaps Tom genuinely has a reason to expect trouble and his intention matters. In another scene, the coat may already tell us everything we need at that moment.

When you find this pattern, cover the explanatory sentence and read the passage again. Notice what disappears. If the meaning remains clear enough, try the passage without it.

Watch for dialogue that is immediately translated

Characters often reveal more through what they say than a draft gives them credit for.

‘Of course I remembered your birthday,’ she said, pushing the unopened card beneath a pile of post. She was embarrassed that she had forgotten.

The action and dialogue already create the contradiction. Naming the embarrassment closes down the reader’s part in the scene.

This happens with subtext too. A tense exchange may be followed by a sentence explaining that both people are angry. A carefully evasive answer may be followed by a reminder that the speaker is hiding something. Read the dialogue on its own and see what is already present.

Repeated emotion can weaken a strong detail

Emotion is often most convincing when it has a physical or behavioural consequence. A woman keeps setting a place for someone who has died. A child becomes meticulous about checking the lock after a burglary. A man deletes a voicemail and then retrieves it from the deleted folder.

Details like these give emotion a particular shape. Following them with a general statement about grief, fear or regret can flatten what was specific into something more familiar.

Keep the explicit emotion when it adds a new layer. A character may smile while feeling frightened, or behave generously while privately furious. The inner information then complicates the visible action instead of translating it.

Explanation can arrive before the reader needs it

Writers sometimes explain a detail at the moment it first appears because they know why it matters. The reader may be perfectly capable of carrying the detail forward for a while.

A folded letter can sit on a desk for three chapters before we learn who wrote it. A character can refuse to enter a particular street without an immediate account of what happened there. A repeated phrase can gather significance each time it appears.

Delay can create curiosity and allow meaning to accumulate. During revision, look at explanatory sentences and ask whether the information belongs here, later, or nowhere.

Beware of explaining the end of a scene

Scene endings are especially vulnerable. The scene reaches an image, decision or line of dialogue with some force, and then the writer adds a sentence to make sure the significance lands.

Imagine a daughter spending a scene insisting that she is finished with her father. At the door, she quietly takes his spare key from the hook and slips it into her pocket. A final sentence explaining that she is not ready to sever the relationship would reduce the work done by the key.

When a scene ending feels soft, look at the final few sentences. The strongest ending may already be sitting slightly higher up the page.

The same habit appears in non-fiction

Over-explanation is not confined to narrative writing. An essay may give a strong example and then restate its lesson at length. A practical article may make a point, illustrate it, summarise it, and then announce the takeaway.

Readers usually need less repetition than a drafting writer expects. Once an example has made the idea clear, move forward. If a summary is useful, let it add consequence, qualification or connection rather than simply reproducing the paragraph above it.

Sometimes the explanation is the better sentence

Cutting the second sentence automatically would be as crude as keeping both. Occasionally the action is vague and the explicit sentence carries the real information. Sometimes the prose has accumulated decorative gestures around a thought that would be stronger if stated plainly.

If a character ‘stared through the rain-streaked glass, tracing the rim of her cup with one finger’ and the important fact is simply that she cannot decide whether to leave her marriage, the direct sentence may deserve to stay. Specificity is useful when the specific detail is doing real work.

Use the duplication test

During revision, look for places where two neighbouring sentences perform the same job. They may use different words while delivering the same information.

Try deleting one. Read across the gap. Then restore it and delete the other. One version will often have more life, precision or useful information.

The same test works across larger units. A paragraph may explain what the following scene demonstrates. Two scenes may establish the same fact about a relationship. An essay may return to an argument that was already settled several pages earlier.

Leaving something unstated works when the evidence on the page is strong enough to support the inference. The answer is not to make every meaning obscure or force the reader to decode ordinary information.

Give the reader the details they need. Be explicit where clarity matters. Then notice when the writing has already conveyed the thought and allow it to stand.

A useful revision question is: have I just explained what the previous sentence already showed? If the answer is yes, one of those sentences may have finished its work.

Related resources

Work on the draft.

Use the wider WritersGroup resource library for revision planning, scene-level work, feedback and editing.

    2026 ©